例句與造句

1. Why does taking log of a pie sign give you a summation sign?
2. The Einstein summation convention dispenses with writing summation signs, leaving the summation implicit.
3. But the introduction of the integral sign by Leibniz clearly paved the way for a summation sign.
4. Einstein convention ) to get rid of all summation signs in tensor equations to make the equations better readable.
5. These equations are using binomial coefficients after the summation sign shown as \ \ binom { n } { i }.
6. It's difficult to find summation sign in a sentence. 用summation sign造句挺難的
7. Other binding operators, like the summation sign, can be thought of as higher-order functions applying to a function.
8. where the summation convention over the repeated indices " i, j, k " has been used to prevent clumsy summation signs.
9. If you take log of a summation sign, do you get a pie sign ?  Preceding talk ) 16 : 49, 30 March 2010 ( UTC)
10. If we compare this with the formula we derived before the environment introduced decoherence we can see that the effect of decoherence has been to move the summation sign \ Sigma _ i from inside of the modulus sign to outside.
11. I can see this is true by plugging in random numbers for the index of pie and expand the terms and then take log, but I just don't see immediately how a log of pie sign gives you a summation sign.
12. where the ^ { ( i ) } on the summation sign indicates that the sum is not over n _ i and is subject to the constraint that the total number of particles associated with the summation is N _ i = N-n _ i.